English
citeglass · AI visibility check

Checked 9/16/2026 · https://www.eureko.sk/

The technical prerequisites for AI discoverability are met.

C
70 / 100
0 critical · 0 to check
Since the last scan: Score +46 · 7 fixed · 3 new

AI crawler matrix

For each bot: what your robots.txt allows — and what your server actually returns to the bot's user agent. Rows highlighted in red: robots allows it, but the server blocks it (usually a WAF or bot-protection rule).

BotOperatorrobots.txtServer response
GPTBotOpenAInot named200 + content
OAI-SearchBotOpenAInot named200 + content
ChatGPT-UserOpenAInot named200 + content
ClaudeBotAnthropicnot named200 + content
Claude-SearchBotAnthropicnot named200 + content
Claude-UserAnthropicnot named200 + content
PerplexityBotPerplexitynot named200 + content
Perplexity-UserPerplexitynot named200 + content
Google-ExtendedGoogle (Gemini-Training)not named
GooglebotGoogle (KI-Übersichten)not named200 + content
CCBotCommon Crawl (Trainingsdaten vieler LLMs)not named200 + content
BytespiderByteDance (Doubao)not named200 + content
AmazonbotAmazon (Alexa/Rufus)not named200 + content
Applebot-ExtendedApple (Intelligence-Training)not named
Meta-ExternalAgentMeta (Llama/Meta AI)not named200 + content
How is the score calculated?
No llms.txt-5
No author or authorship signal-4
No sitemap.xml found-4
Elevated server response time-4
Heading levels are skipped-3
No visible or marked-up date-3
No canonical URL-3
No robots.txt found-2
No FAQ or HowTo markup-2
Result70 / 100

Access for AI crawlers

note

No robots.txt found

No valid file was reachable at /robots.txt. Crawlers then assume "everything allowed" — it works, but you have no control and no sitemap signal.

This is what you should do: Create a robots.txt in the root directory, at least with a sitemap reference and your desired allow/disallow rules.

User-agent: *
Allow: /

Sitemap: https://your-domain.com/sitemap.xml

Structure & machine understanding

note

No llms.txt

There is no file at /llms.txt. llms.txt is a short Markdown overview of your key content that some AI systems use for orientation.

This is what you should do: Create an /llms.txt: an H1 with the name, a short paragraph about the offering, and a link list to the central pages.

# Your company

> One-sentence description.

## Key pages
- [Product](https://your-domain.com/product): …
- [Pricing](https://your-domain.com/pricing): …
- [About](https://your-domain.com/about): …
note

Heading levels are skipped

The heading sequence skips at least one level (e.g. H2 straight to H4). This makes it harder to reconstruct the content structure automatically.

This is what you should do: Use the heading levels without gaps and in order (H1 → H2 → H3 …).

note

No FAQ or HowTo markup

Question-and-answer and step-by-step content is harder for AI systems to recognise as directly citable answers without FAQPage or HowTo markup.

This is what you should do: Where the page answers real questions or gives instructions, mark it up as FAQPage or HowTo (no markup without visibly matching content).

Trust and entity signals (E-E-A-T)

note

No author or authorship signal

No author is recognisable (neither meta tag, rel=author nor JSON-LD Person). For "experience" and "expertise" in the E-E-A-T sense, named, traceable authorship matters.

This is what you should do: For editorial content, name an author and link an author page; also mark them up as JSON-LD "Person".

note

No visible or marked-up date

No publication or modification date is recognisable (neither <time>, article:published_time nor datePublished in the JSON-LD). For many questions, AI systems prefer current sources.

This is what you should do: For content with a time reference, show a date visibly and mark up datePublished / dateModified in the JSON-LD.

Technical foundation

note

No sitemap.xml found

No valid XML sitemap was reachable at /sitemap.xml and robots.txt names none. A sitemap helps crawlers find all relevant URLs.

This is what you should do: Generate a sitemap.xml with all indexable URLs and reference it in robots.txt.

note

Elevated server response time

The time to first byte was around 1751 ms — noticeable, but not yet critical.

This is what you should do: Watch the response time and check caching or a CDN if it keeps rising.

note

No canonical URL

The page sets no <link rel="canonical">. Without a canonical, it can stay unclear which version is authoritative when several URL variants exist.

This is what you should do: Set a self-referencing <link rel="canonical"> with the preferred URL on every page.

OK (5)
  • The main content is in the HTML without JavaScript.
  • Structured data (JSON-LD) is present. — WebSite, Organization, LocalBusiness
  • The organisation is marked up as JSON-LD.
  • Exactly one H1 heading.
  • The page title has a sensible length.

Next steps

  1. No llms.txt. Create an /llms.txt: an H1 with the name, a short paragraph about the offering, and a link list to the central pages.
  2. No author or authorship signal. For editorial content, name an author and link an author page; also mark them up as JSON-LD "Person".
  3. No sitemap.xml found. Generate a sitemap.xml with all indexable URLs and reference it in robots.txt.
Monitor this page

Weekly re-scan with an email alert on every change. In preparation — add your address.

Method & limits

Checked 9/16/2026. citeglass fetches eureko.sk and its related files (robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap.xml) over HTTP — once as a normal browser, once per AI crawler user agent. No JavaScript is executed. Time to first byte: 1751 ms.

What this is not: No rank or citation tracking, no statement about whether a model actually names you, and no check of content loaded via JavaScript. A snapshot from the perspective of one server IP.

Check another website